Since the Building Safety Act 2022 came into force, building owners and managers of higher-risk residential buildings have had to get to grips with a set of new legal roles. Two of the most confused are the Accountable Person and the Principal Accountable Person.

They sound similar. They are not the same. Getting this wrong creates personal legal liability. Here is a plain-English guide to both roles.

What is a Higher-Risk Building?

Before getting to the roles, you need to know whether the Building Safety Act applies to your building.

A Higher-Risk Building (HRB) under the BSA 2022 is a building that:

If your building meets both criteria, it is an HRB. It must be registered with the Building Safety Regulator (BSR), it must have a compliant safety case, and it must have both an Accountable Person and — if there is more than one — a Principal Accountable Person.

Buildings that are 11 metres or more but below 18 metres are subject to many of the same obligations under the Fire Safety Act 2021 and the Fire Safety (England) Regulations 2022, but are not technically HRBs for the purposes of the BSA safety case regime.

The Accountable Person (AP)

An Accountable Person is any person who holds a legal obligation in relation to the common parts of a higher-risk building. In practice, this typically means:

An HRB can have more than one AP — for example, if different parts of a mixed-use building are held by different entities.

Each AP has specific legal duties under the BSA 2022, including:

AP duties are personal. If the AP is a company, the duties fall on the company — but directors can be held personally liable for serious failures. The maximum criminal penalty is 2 years' imprisonment and an unlimited fine.

The Principal Accountable Person (PAP)

When there is more than one Accountable Person for an HRB, one of them must be designated as the Principal Accountable Person.

The PAP is determined by who holds the legal obligation in relation to the structure and exterior of the building. In most buildings, this is the freeholder.

The PAP has all the same duties as an AP, plus additional responsibilities:

Accountable Person (AP)

  • Holds obligation for common parts
  • Safety Case for their section
  • FRA for common parts
  • Golden Thread maintenance
  • Resident Engagement Strategy
  • Mandatory occurrence reporting
  • Must cooperate with other APs

Principal Accountable Person (PAP)

  • All AP duties above, PLUS:
  • Registers the building with BSR
  • Applies for Building Assessment Certificate
  • Coordinates all APs
  • Maintains AP register
  • Notifies BSR of AP changes
  • Usually the freeholder

If there is only one AP — what then?

If a building has only one entity with obligations over the common parts (e.g. a single freeholder with no other leaseholders holding common part obligations), that entity is both the AP and the PAP. The distinction only matters when there are multiple APs.

What about the Building Safety Manager?

Here is where people often get confused. The original Building Safety Act as drafted included a requirement for a Building Safety Manager (BSM) — a named individual responsible for day-to-day building safety management. This was a distinct role from the AP/PAP.

However, Sections 76–79 of the BSA 2022 (which created the BSM role) were never commenced. The Government decided not to bring the BSM into force, concluding that the role was already covered by the AP/PAP regime.

What this means in practice: there is no legal requirement to appoint a Building Safety Manager under the BSA 2022. The AP/PAP is responsible for managing building safety, either personally or by appointing a competent person or managing agent to assist.

Despite the BSM not being a statutory role, many larger building owners appoint a named individual with building safety expertise to manage day-to-day compliance. This is good practice even if it is not legally required.

The Building Assessment Certificate — what is it?

Once a building is registered, the PAP must apply for a Building Assessment Certificate (BAC) from the BSR. The BAC is the BSR's assessment that the building's safety case is adequate and that the AP/PAP is meeting their obligations.

The BAC application involves submitting:

BSR can refuse to issue a BAC, issue it with conditions, or take enforcement action if compliance is not demonstrated. A building without a BAC is not necessarily in breach, but BSR can require one at any time.

Consequences of getting this wrong

The BSR has significant enforcement powers:

Not sure if your building is compliant?

We provide independent Gateway 2 review services and building safety compliance advice for higher-risk buildings. Fixed fee: from £750. Delivered within 5–7 working days.

Gateway 2 Review — £750 →